SamsungGalaxy M53
$349
SamsungGalaxy M53 vs Huawei Mate 90 Pro
Huawei Mate 90 Pro
$985
| M53 | Mate 90 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 349 | USD 985 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | HiSilicon Kirin 9035 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 120Hz | 6.75" • Dual-layer OLED (LTPO) • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 108MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 12 | HarmonyOS 7.0 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 636 cheaper
M53USD 349
vsMate 90 ProUSD 985
RAM
2× more RAM
Mate 90 Pro12 GB RAM
vsM536 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Mate 90 Pro256 GB
vsM53128 GB
Battery
32% larger battery
Mate 90 Pro6,600 mAh
vsM535,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
Mate 90 Pro100 W wired
vsM5325 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
M53MediaTek Dimensity 900
vsMate 90 ProHiSilicon Kirin 9035
Build
46 g lighter
M53176 g
vsMate 90 Pro222 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsungGalaxy M53
Much lower purchase priceUSD 349
Lighter build176 g
Best if you want
More hardwareHuawei Mate 90 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,600 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
What CompareTab says about SamsungGalaxy M53 vs Huawei Mate 90 Pro
Huawei Mate 90 Pro combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than M53, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6600 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and 100 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds optical image stabilization on the main camera, a telephoto rear camera, and wireless charging. SamsungGalaxy M53, however, is around $636 cheaper, lighter at 176 g versus 222 g, and thinner at 7.4 mm versus 7.95 mm and has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The main trade-off is Mate 90 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus M53’s lower price, lighter, thinner build, and higher-resolution front camera.
