Samsung Galaxy S25 512GB
$959
Samsung Galaxy S25 512GB vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E
$719
| Galaxy S25 512GB | X300 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 959 | USD 719 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 90 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.2" • Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 240 cheaper
X300 EUSD 719
vsGalaxy S25 512GBUSD 959
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy S25 512GB512 GB
vsX300 E256 GB
Battery
80% larger battery
X300 E7,200 mAh
vsGalaxy S25 512GB4,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
X300 E90 W wired
vsGalaxy S25 512GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy S25 512GBQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
Larger144Hz
X300 E6.59″ · 144Hz
vsGalaxy S25 512GB6.2″ · 120Hz
Build
38 g lighter
Galaxy S25 512GB162 g
vsX300 E199.5 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactSamsung Galaxy S25 512GB
More storage512 GB
Lighter build162 g
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 E
Much lower purchase priceUSD 719
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 144Hz display6.59″ · 144Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy S25 512GB vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy S25 512GB, with a 7200 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 12 MP). Samsung Galaxy S25 512GB, however, is lighter at 162 g versus 199.5 g and thinner at 7.2 mm versus 7.79 mm and offers 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB. The main trade-off is X300 E’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy S25 512GB’s lighter, thinner build.
