Samsung Galaxy M56 5G vs Sony Xperia Ace III

close
Samsung Galaxy M56 5G

Samsung Galaxy M56 5G

$335

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
Sony Xperia Ace III

Sony Xperia Ace III

$255

4 GB RAM 64 GB

Galaxy M56 5GXperia Ace III
PriceUSD 335USD 255
Battery5000 mAh4500 mAh
Charging (W)4518
RAM8 GB4 GB
Storage256 GB64 GB
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 1480Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
Display6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 120Hz5.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz
Main Camera50MP13MP
Front Camera12MP5MP
OSAndroid 15Android 12

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 80 cheaper
vsGalaxy M56 5GUSD 335
RAM
2× more RAM
vsXperia Ace III4 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
vsXperia Ace III64 GB
Battery
11% larger battery
vsXperia Ace III4,500 mAh
Charging
27 W faster wired charging
vsXperia Ace III18 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsXperia Ace IIIQualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
Display
Larger120Hz
vsXperia Ace III5.5″ · 60Hz

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy M56 5G

More hardware
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.7″ · 120Hz
Best if you want

Sony Xperia Ace III

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 255
Smaller 5.5-inch display5.5″

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M56 5G vs Sony Xperia Ace III

Samsung Galaxy M56 5G has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Xperia Ace III, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (12 MP versus 5 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 45W charging. Sony Xperia Ace III, however, is around $80.00 cheaper and lighter at 162 g versus 180 g. The choice comes down to Galaxy M56 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Xperia Ace III’s lower price and lighter build.