
Samsung Galaxy F35 5G
$299
| Galaxy F35 5G | S1 4GB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 299 | USD 228 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 18 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 |
| Display | 6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.38" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 16MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 9 Pie |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Samsung Galaxy F35 5G has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over S1 4GB, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 16 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, NFC, and 25W charging. Vivo S1 4GB, however, is around $71.00 cheaper, lighter at 179 g versus 222 g, and thinner at 8.13 mm versus 9.1 mm and has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The choice comes down to Galaxy F35 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus S1 4GB’s lower price, lighter, thinner build, and higher-resolution front camera.
Build Comparison
Select products to compare.
Selection
Select up to 4 items to compare.