Samsung Galaxy F08
$179
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| Galaxy F08 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 179 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 44 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99+ | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.7" • PLS LCD • 90Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 72 cheaper
Galaxy F08USD 179
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
Storage
2× more storage
Y32 (2026)128 GB
vsGalaxy F0864 GB
Battery
33% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsGalaxy F086,000 mAh
Charging
19 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsGalaxy F0825 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy F08MediaTek Helio G99+
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy F086.7″ · 90Hz
Build
32 g lighter
Galaxy F08197 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy F08
Much lower purchase priceUSD 179
Lighter build197 g
Smaller 6.7-inch display6.7″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
More storage128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy F08 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy F08, with 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 6000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 25 W. Samsung Galaxy F08, however, is around $72.00 cheaper, lighter at 197 g versus 229 g, and thinner at 8 mm versus 8.69 mm. The choice comes down to Y32 (2026)’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy F08’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
