Samsung Galaxy A73
$499
Samsung Galaxy A73 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Galaxy A73 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 499 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 108MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 200 cheaper
Galaxy A73USD 499
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A738 GB RAM
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsGalaxy A735,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsGalaxy A7325 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A73Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsGalaxy A73120 Hz
Build
25 g lighter
Galaxy A73181 g
vsF9 Pro206 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A73
Much lower purchase priceUSD 499
Lighter build181 g
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A73 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy A73, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 108 MP), a telephoto rear camera, and wireless charging. Samsung Galaxy A73, however, is around $200 cheaper, lighter at 181 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.6 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and camera features versus the Galaxy A73’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
