Samsung Galaxy A52s
$449
Samsung Galaxy A52s vs vivo X500 Pro
vivo X500 Pro
$903
| Galaxy A52s | X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 449 | USD 903 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro |
| Display | 6.5" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.36" • LTPO AMOLED (8T) • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 454 cheaper
Galaxy A52sUSD 449
vsX500 ProUSD 903
RAM
4 GB more RAM
X500 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A52s8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X500 Pro256 GB
vsGalaxy A52s128 GB
Battery
45% larger battery
X500 Pro6,510 mAh
vsGalaxy A52s4,500 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
X500 Pro90 W wired
vsGalaxy A52s25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A52sQualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
vsX500 ProMediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
Display
144 Hz refresh
X500 Pro144 Hz
vsGalaxy A52s120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A52s
Much lower purchase priceUSD 449
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X500 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,510 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.36-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A52s vs vivo X500 Pro
vivo X500 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy A52s, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6510 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP), a telephoto rear camera, wireless charging, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy A52s, however, is around $454 cheaper. The main trade-off is X500 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A52s’s lower price.
