Compare Mobiles

close
Samsung Galaxy A30

Samsung Galaxy A30

$230

4 GB RAM 64 GB

close
vivo Y32 (2026)

vivo Y32 (2026)

$251

4 GB RAM 128 GB

Galaxy A30Y32 (2026)
PriceUSD 230USD 251
Battery4000 mAh8000 mAh
Charging (W)1544
RAM4 GB4 GB
Storage64 GB128 GB
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 7904UNISOC T7300
Display6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz6.87" • LCD • 120Hz
Main Camera16MP50MP
Front Camera16MP8MP
OSAndroid 9Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 21 cheaper
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
Storage
2× more storage
vsGalaxy A3064 GB
Battery
100% larger battery
vsGalaxy A304,000 mAh
Charging
29 W faster wired charging
vsGalaxy A3015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
vsGalaxy A306.4″ · 60Hz
Build
64 g lighter
vsY32 (2026)229 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A30

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 230
Lighter build165 g
Smaller 6.4-inch display6.4″
Best if you want

vivo Y32 (2026)

More hardware
More storage128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A30 vs vivo Y32 (2026)

vivo Y32 (2026) has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy A30, with 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 16 MP). Samsung Galaxy A30, however, is cheaper at around $230 versus $251, lighter at 165 g versus 229 g, and thinner at 7.7 mm versus 8.69 mm and has a higher-resolution 16 MP front camera. The choice comes down to Y32 (2026)’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A30’s lower price, lighter, thinner build, and higher-resolution front camera.