Samsung Galaxy A30
$230
Samsung Galaxy A30 vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
$175
| Galaxy A30 | Pova 4 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 230 | USD 175 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 45 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7904 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.66" • AMOLED • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 16MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 12 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 55 cheaper
Pova 4 ProUSD 175
vsGalaxy A30USD 230
RAM
2× more RAM
Pova 4 Pro8 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A304 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Pova 4 Pro256 GB
vsGalaxy A3064 GB
Battery
50% larger battery
Pova 4 Pro6,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A304,000 mAh
Charging
30 W faster wired charging
Pova 4 Pro45 W wired
vsGalaxy A3015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A30Samsung Exynos 7904
vsPova 4 ProMediaTek Helio G99
Display
Larger90Hz
Pova 4 Pro6.66″ · 90Hz
vsGalaxy A306.4″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareTecno Pova 4 Pro
Much lower purchase priceUSD 175
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A30 vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
Tecno Pova 4 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy A30, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 16 MP) and 45W charging. Samsung Galaxy A30, however, is thinner at 7.7 mm versus 9.19 mm and has a higher-resolution 16 MP front camera. The choice comes down to Pova 4 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A30’s thinner body and higher-resolution front camera.
