Samsung Galaxy A22
$229
Samsung Galaxy A22 vs Vivo Y02t
Vivo Y02t
$175
| Galaxy A22 | Y02t | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 229 | USD 175 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 | MediaTek Helio P35 |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.51" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 8MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 54 cheaper
Y02tUSD 175
vsGalaxy A22USD 229
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Galaxy A226 GB RAM
vsY02t4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy A22128 GB
vsY02t64 GB
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
Galaxy A2215 W wired
vsY02t10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A22MediaTek Helio G80
vsY02tMediaTek Helio P35
Display
90 Hz refresh
Galaxy A2290 Hz
vsY02t60 Hz
Camera
Higher resolution
Galaxy A2248MP rear · 13MP front
vsY02t8MP rear · 5MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy A22
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Faster wired charging15 W wired
Up to 90 Hz display6.4-inch
Higher-resolution cameras48MP rear · 13MP front
Best if you want
Lower priceVivo Y02t
Much lower purchase priceUSD 175
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A22 vs Vivo Y02t
Samsung Galaxy A22 combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than Y02t, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 15 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (48 MP versus 8 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 5 MP), and optical image stabilization on the main camera. Vivo Y02t, however, is around $54.00 cheaper. The choice comes down to Galaxy A22’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Y02t’s lower price.
