Samsung Galaxy A15 256GB
$199
Samsung Galaxy A15 256GB vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra
$799
| Galaxy A15 256GB | F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 199 | USD 799 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8050 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) |
| Display | 6.5" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 600 cheaper
Galaxy A15 256GBUSD 199
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A15 256GB8 GB RAM
Battery
61% larger battery
F9 Ultra8,050 mAh
vsGalaxy A15 256GB5,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
F9 Ultra100 W wired
vsGalaxy A15 256GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A15 256GBMediaTek Helio G99
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Ultra6.9″ · 185Hz
vsGalaxy A15 256GB6.5″ · 90Hz
Build
35 g lighter
Galaxy A15 256GB200 g
vsF9 Ultra235 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A15 256GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 199
Lighter build200 g
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Ultra
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A15 256GB vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy A15 256GB, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 13 MP), and optical image stabilization on the main camera. Samsung Galaxy A15 256GB, however, is around $600 cheaper, lighter at 200 g versus 235 g, and thinner at 8.4 mm versus 8.74 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Galaxy A15 256GB’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
