Samsung Galaxy A13 128GB
$225
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| Galaxy A13 128GB | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 225 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 44 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.6" • PLS LCD • 60Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 26 cheaper
Galaxy A13 128GBUSD 225
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
Battery
60% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A13 128GB5,000 mAh
Charging
29 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsGalaxy A13 128GB15 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A13 128GBSamsung Exynos 850
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A13 128GB6.6″ · 60Hz
Build
34 g lighter
Galaxy A13 128GB195 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A13 128GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 225
Lighter build195 g
Smaller 6.6-inch display6.6″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A13 128GB vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy A13 128GB, with a 8000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 15 W. Samsung Galaxy A13 128GB, however, is cheaper at around $225 versus $251 and lighter at 195 g versus 229 g. The main trade-off is the Y32 (2026)’s faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Galaxy A13 128GB’s lower price and lighter build.
