Samsung Galaxy A05
$139
Samsung Galaxy A05 vs Motorola Moto G47 Power
Motorola Moto G47 Power
$403
| Galaxy A05 | Moto G47 Power | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 403 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 30 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Display | 6.7" • PLS LCD • 60Hz | 6.67" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 108MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 264 cheaper
Galaxy A05USD 139
vsMoto G47 PowerUSD 403
Battery
40% larger battery
Moto G47 Power7,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A055,000 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
Moto G47 Power30 W wired
vsGalaxy A0525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A05MediaTek Helio G85
vsMoto G47 PowerMediaTek Dimensity 6300
Display
120 Hz refresh
Moto G47 Power120 Hz
vsGalaxy A0560 Hz
Build
20 g lighter
Galaxy A05195 g
vsMoto G47 Power215 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
Moto G47 Power108MP rear
vsGalaxy A0550MP rear
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A05
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Lighter build195 g
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Moto G47 Power
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging30 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.67-inch
Higher-resolution main camera108MP rear
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A05 vs Motorola Moto G47 Power
Motorola Moto G47 Power has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy A05, with a 7000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 30 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (108 MP versus 50 MP) and NFC. Samsung Galaxy A05, however, is around $264 cheaper and lighter at 195 g versus 215 g. The main trade-off is the Moto G47 Power’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus the Galaxy A05’s lower price and lighter build.
