Realme C75x
$169
Realme C75x vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| C75x | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 169 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.67" • IPS LCD Eye Comfort Display • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 530 cheaper
C75xUSD 169
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
2× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsC75x6 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsC75x128 GB
Battery
13% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsC75x5,600 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsC75x45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
C75xMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsC75x120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceRealme C75x
Much lower purchase priceUSD 169
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Realme C75x vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over C75x, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5600 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Realme C75x, however, is around $530 cheaper, lighter at 196 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.99 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the C75x’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
