POCO F9 Pro
$699
POCO F9 Pro vs OnePlus 6
OnePlus 6
$529
| F9 Pro | 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 699 | USD 529 |
| Battery | 6330 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 100 | 20 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Display | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz | 6.28" • Optic AMOLED • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 200MP | 16MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 170 cheaper
6USD 529
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
2× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vs66 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vs664 GB
Battery
92% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vs63,300 mAh
Charging
80 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vs620 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
F9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
vs6Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vs66.28″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceOnePlus 6
Much lower purchase priceUSD 529
Smaller 6.28-inch display6.28″
What CompareTab says about POCO F9 Pro vs OnePlus 6
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 6, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 3300 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 16 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 16 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. OnePlus 6, however, is around $170 cheaper, lighter at 177 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.75 mm versus 8.79 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 6’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
