Oppo Reno16 F
$542
Oppo Reno16 F vs iQOO Neo12
iQOO Neo12
$660
| Reno16 F | Neo12 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 542 | USD 660 |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 9000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 118 cheaper
Reno16 FUSD 542
vsNeo12USD 660
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Neo1212 GB RAM
vsReno16 F8 GB RAM
Battery
29% larger battery
Neo129,000 mAh
vsReno16 F7,000 mAh
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Neo12100 W wired
vsReno16 F80 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno16 FMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
vsNeo12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Display
Larger185Hz
Neo126.83″ · 185Hz
vsReno16 F6.57″ · 120Hz
Build
30 g lighter
Reno16 F195 g
vsNeo12225 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOppo Reno16 F
Much lower purchase priceUSD 542
Lighter build195 g
Smaller 6.57-inch display6.57″
Best if you want
More hardwareiQOO Neo12
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery9,000 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.83″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Oppo Reno16 F vs iQOO Neo12
iQOO Neo12 offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Reno16 F, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 9000 mAh battery versus 7000 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 80 W. Oppo Reno16 F, however, is around $118 cheaper and lighter at 195 g versus 225 g and has a higher-resolution 50 MP front camera. The choice comes down to Neo12’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Reno16 F’s lower price, lighter build, and higher-resolution front camera.
