Oppo Reno16 F vs Samsung Galaxy A71

close
Oppo Reno16 F

Oppo Reno16 F

$542

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
Samsung Galaxy A71

Samsung Galaxy A71

$419

8 GB RAM 128 GB

Reno16 FGalaxy A71
PriceUSD 542USD 419
Battery7000 mAh4500 mAh
Charging (W)8025
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage256 GB128 GB
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300-EnergyQualcomm Snapdragon 730
Display6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 60Hz
Main Camera50MP64MP
Front Camera50MP32MP
OSAndroid 16Android 10

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 123 cheaper
vsReno16 FUSD 542
Storage
2× more storage
vsGalaxy A71128 GB
Battery
56% larger battery
vsGalaxy A714,500 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
vsGalaxy A7125 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsGalaxy A71Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
Display
120 Hz refresh
vsGalaxy A7160 Hz
Build
16 g lighter
vsReno16 F195 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Oppo Reno16 F

More hardware
More storage256 GB
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.57-inch
Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A71

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 419
Lighter build179 g

What CompareTab says about Oppo Reno16 F vs Samsung Galaxy A71

Oppo Reno16 F has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy A71, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 80 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and a telephoto rear camera. Samsung Galaxy A71, however, is around $123 cheaper, lighter at 179 g versus 195 g, and thinner at 7.7 mm versus 8.44 mm. The main trade-off is Reno16 F’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Galaxy A71’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.