OnePlus X
$249
OnePlus X vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| X | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 249 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 2525 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 100 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 5" • Active Matrix OLED • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 5.1.1 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 450 cheaper
XUSD 249
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
4× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsX3 GB RAM
Storage
16× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsX16 GB
Battery
151% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsX2,525 mAh
Charging
90 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsX10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
XQualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vsX5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOnePlus X
Much lower purchase priceUSD 249
Smaller 5-inch display5″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about OnePlus X vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over X, with 12 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 16 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 2525 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. OnePlus X, however, is around $450 cheaper, lighter at 138 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 6.9 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus X’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
