OnePlus 3
$399
OnePlus 3 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| 3 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 399 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 20 | 100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 5.5" • Optic AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 16MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 300 cheaper
3USD 399
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
2× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vs36 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vs364 GB
Battery
111% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vs33,000 mAh
Charging
80 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vs320 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
3Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vs35.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOnePlus 3
Much lower purchase priceUSD 399
Smaller 5.5-inch display5.5″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about OnePlus 3 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 3, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 3000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 16 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. OnePlus 3, however, is around $300 cheaper, lighter at 158 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.35 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the 3’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
