Oppo Reno14 F 5G
$359
Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E
$719
| Reno14 F 5G | X300 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 359 | USD 719 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.57" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 360 cheaper
Reno14 F 5GUSD 359
vsX300 EUSD 719
RAM
4 GB more RAM
X300 E12 GB RAM
vsReno14 F 5G8 GB RAM
Battery
20% larger battery
X300 E7,200 mAh
vsReno14 F 5G6,000 mAh
Charging
45 W faster wired charging
X300 E90 W wired
vsReno14 F 5G45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno14 F 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
144 Hz refresh
X300 E144 Hz
vsReno14 F 5G120 Hz
Build
20 g lighter
Reno14 F 5G180 g
vsX300 E199.5 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOppo Reno14 F 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 359
Lighter build180 g
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 E
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Reno14 F 5G, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 6000 mAh, a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 45 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP) and a telephoto rear camera. Oppo Reno14 F 5G, however, is around $360 cheaper and lighter at 180 g versus 199.5 g. The main trade-off is the X300 E’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and camera features versus the Reno14 F 5G’s lower price and lighter build.
