OPPO K15 Pro
$418
OPPO K15 Pro vs Oppo Reno16 FS
Oppo Reno16 FS
$890
| K15 Pro | Reno16 FS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 418 | USD 890 |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 45 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 SUPER | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy |
| Display | 6.59" • Flat AMOLED display • 144Hz | 6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 472 cheaper
K15 ProUSD 418
vsReno16 FSUSD 890
RAM
4 GB more RAM
K15 Pro12 GB RAM
vsReno16 FS8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Reno16 FS512 GB
vsK15 Pro256 GB
Battery
15% larger battery
K15 Pro7,500 mAh
vsReno16 FS6,500 mAh
Charging
35 W faster wired charging
K15 Pro80 W wired
vsReno16 FS45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
K15 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8500 SUPER
vsReno16 FSMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
Display
144 Hz refresh
K15 Pro144 Hz
vsReno16 FS120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO K15 Pro
Much lower purchase priceUSD 418
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,500 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Best if you want
More storageOppo Reno16 FS
More storage512 GB
What CompareTab says about OPPO K15 Pro vs Oppo Reno16 FS
OPPO K15 Pro offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Reno16 FS, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7500 mAh battery versus 6500 mAh, a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 80 W wired charging versus 45 W. Oppo Reno16 FS, however, has higher quoted peak brightness at 1400 nits versus 1200 nits and a higher-resolution 50 MP front camera and offers 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB. The main trade-off is the K15 Pro’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Reno16 FS’s higher quoted peak brightness and higher-resolution front camera.
