OPPO F35 Pro 5G
$520
OPPO F35 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 50C
Tecno Spark 50C
$178
| F35 Pro 5G | Spark 50C | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 520 | USD 178 |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 15 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Max | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Display | 6.78" • Flexible AMOLED • 144Hz | 6.78" • IPS LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 342 cheaper
Spark 50CUSD 178
vsF35 Pro 5GUSD 520
RAM
2 GB more RAM
F35 Pro 5G6 GB RAM
vsSpark 50C4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F35 Pro 5G128 GB
vsSpark 50C64 GB
Battery
54% larger battery
F35 Pro 5G8,000 mAh
vsSpark 50C5,200 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
F35 Pro 5G80 W wired
vsSpark 50C15 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
F35 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7360 Max
vsSpark 50CMediaTek Helio G81
Display
144 Hz refresh
F35 Pro 5G144 Hz
vsSpark 50C120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO F35 Pro 5G
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.78-inch
Best if you want
Lower priceTecno Spark 50C
Much lower purchase priceUSD 178
What CompareTab says about OPPO F35 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 50C
OPPO F35 Pro 5G has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Spark 50C, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 5200 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 80W charging. Tecno Spark 50C, however, is around $342 cheaper and thinner at 7.9 mm versus 8.4 mm. The main trade-off is F35 Pro 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Spark 50C’s lower price and thinner body.
