Oppo A5
$219
Oppo A5 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| A5 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 219 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.2" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 8.1 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 480 cheaper
A5USD 219
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
3× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsA54 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsA532 GB
Battery
50% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsA54,230 mAh
Charging
90 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsA510 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A5Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vsA56.2″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOppo A5
Much lower purchase priceUSD 219
Smaller 6.2-inch display6.2″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Oppo A5 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over A5, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Oppo A5, however, is around $480 cheaper, lighter at 170 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 8.2 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the A5’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
