Motorola Razr 50
$699
Motorola Razr 50 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra
$799
| Razr 50 | F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 699 | USD 799 |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 8050 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO P-OLED • 120Hz | 6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 100 cheaper
Razr 50USD 699
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsRazr 508 GB RAM
Battery
92% larger battery
F9 Ultra8,050 mAh
vsRazr 504,200 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
F9 Ultra100 W wired
vsRazr 5030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Razr 50MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Ultra185 Hz
vsRazr 50120 Hz
Build
47 g lighter
Razr 50188 g
vsF9 Ultra235 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceMotorola Razr 50
Much lower purchase priceUSD 699
Lighter build188 g
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Ultra
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.9-inch
What CompareTab says about Motorola Razr 50 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Razr 50, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 4200 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and a telephoto rear camera. Motorola Razr 50, however, is around $100 cheaper, lighter at 188 g versus 235 g, and thinner at 7.25 mm versus 8.74 mm. The main trade-off is F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and camera features versus Razr 50’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
