Motorola Razr 50
$699
Motorola Razr 50 vs Honor Win Turbo2
Honor Win Turbo2
$524
| Razr 50 | Win Turbo2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 699 | USD 524 |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 12070 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO P-OLED • 120Hz | 6.89" • OLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 14 | MagicOS 11 (Android 17) |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 175 cheaper
Win Turbo2USD 524
vsRazr 50USD 699
Battery
187% larger battery
Win Turbo212,070 mAh
vsRazr 504,200 mAh
Charging
60 W faster wired charging
Win Turbo290 W wired
vsRazr 5030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Razr 50MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
vsWin Turbo2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Display
185 Hz refresh
Win Turbo2185 Hz
vsRazr 50120 Hz
Build
47 g lighter
Razr 50188 g
vsWin Turbo2235 g
Build
More compact thickness
Razr 507.25 mm
vsWin Turbo28.5 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactMotorola Razr 50
Lighter build188 g
Thinner body7.25 mm
Best if you want
More hardwareHonor Win Turbo2
Much lower purchase priceUSD 524
Larger battery12,070 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.89-inch
What CompareTab says about Motorola Razr 50 vs Honor Win Turbo2
Honor Win Turbo2 has the larger display and faster wired charging than Razr 50, with a 12070 mAh battery versus 4200 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP) and an ultrawide rear camera. Motorola Razr 50, however, is lighter at 188 g versus 235 g and thinner at 7.25 mm versus 8.5 mm. The choice comes down to Win Turbo2’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and camera features versus Razr 50’s lighter, thinner build.
