Motorola Razr 70 vs Samsung W27

close
Motorola Razr 70

Motorola Razr 70

$800

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
Samsung W27

Samsung W27

$2,852

16 GB RAM 512 GB

Razr 70W27
PriceUSD 800USD 2,852
Battery4800 mAh5000 mAh
Charging (W)3045
RAM8 GB16 GB
Storage256 GB512 GB
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7450XQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy
Display6.9" • LTPO Extreme AMOLED (foldable) • 120Hz8" • Dynamic AMOLED 2X • 120Hz
Main Camera50MP200MP
Front Camera32MP10MP
OSAndroid 16Android 17

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 2,052.01 cheaper
vsW27USD 2,852
RAM
2× more RAM
vsRazr 708 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
vsRazr 70256 GB
Battery
200 mAh larger battery
vsRazr 704,800 mAh
Charging
15 W faster wired charging
vsRazr 7030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsW27Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy
Display
Larger display
vsRazr 706.9-inch

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Motorola Razr 70

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 800
Smaller 6.9-inch display6.9″
Best if you want

Samsung W27

More hardware
More RAM and storage16 GB RAM · 512 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 8-inch8-inch

What CompareTab says about Motorola Razr 70 vs Samsung W27

Samsung W27 offers more RAM, storage and a larger battery than Razr 70, with 16 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 4800 mAh, and a 8 inch display versus 6.9 inch. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), a telephoto rear camera, and 45W charging. Motorola Razr 70, however, is around $2,052 cheaper and lighter at 188 g versus 215 g and has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The choice comes down to W27’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and larger display versus Razr 70’s lower price, lighter build, and higher-resolution front camera.