Motorola Razr 60
$699
Motorola Razr 60 vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E
$719
| Razr 60 | X300 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 699 | USD 719 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 20 cheaper
Razr 60USD 699
vsX300 EUSD 719
RAM
4 GB more RAM
X300 E12 GB RAM
vsRazr 608 GB RAM
Battery
60% larger battery
X300 E7,200 mAh
vsRazr 604,500 mAh
Charging
60 W faster wired charging
X300 E90 W wired
vsRazr 6030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Razr 60MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
Larger display
Razr 606.9-inch
vsX300 E6.59-inch
Display
144 Hz refresh
X300 E144 Hz
vsRazr 60120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceMotorola Razr 60
Much lower purchase priceUSD 699
Larger 6.9-inch6.9-inch
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 E
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Motorola Razr 60 vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Razr 60, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP) and a telephoto rear camera. Motorola Razr 60 counters with a larger 6.9 inch display, lighter at 188 g versus 199.5 g, and thinner at 7.25 mm versus 7.79 mm. The main trade-off is X300 E’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and camera features versus Razr 60’s larger display and lighter, thinner build.
