Motorola Razr 60 vs OPPO Reno 16c

close
Motorola Razr 60

Motorola Razr 60

$699

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
OPPO Reno 16c

OPPO Reno 16c

$539

8 GB RAM 128 GB

Razr 60Reno 16c
PriceUSD 699USD 539
Battery4500 mAh7000 mAh
Charging (W)3080
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage256 GB128 GB
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400XMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
Display6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 120Hz6.57" • Crystal Guard AMOLED • 120Hz
Main Camera50MP50MP
Front Camera32MP50MP
OSAndroid 15Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 160 cheaper
vsRazr 60USD 699
Storage
2× more storage
vsReno 16c128 GB
Battery
56% larger battery
vsRazr 604,500 mAh
Charging
50 W faster wired charging
vsRazr 6030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsReno 16cMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
Display
Larger display
vsReno 16c6.57-inch
Build
More compact thickness
vsReno 16c8.4 mm

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Motorola Razr 60

More hardware
More storage256 GB
Larger 6.9-inch6.9-inch
Thinner body7.25 mm
Best if you want

OPPO Reno 16c

More hardware
Much lower purchase priceUSD 539
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Smaller 6.57-inch display6.57″

What CompareTab says about Motorola Razr 60 vs OPPO Reno 16c

Motorola Razr 60 offers more storage than Reno 16c, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB and a 6.9 inch display versus 6.57 inch. It also adds wireless charging and NFC. OPPO Reno 16c, however, is around $160 cheaper, has a larger 7000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh and a higher-resolution 50 MP front camera, and supports faster wired charging at 80 W versus 30 W. The choice comes down to Razr 60’s storage, larger display, and wireless charging versus Reno 16c’s lower price, larger battery, faster charging, and higher-resolution front camera.