Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs vivo X300 E

close
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

$1,300

16 GB RAM 512 GB

close
vivo X300 E

vivo X300 E

$719

12 GB RAM 256 GB

Razr 60 UltraX300 E
PriceUSD 1,300USD 719
Battery4700 mAh7200 mAh
Charging (W)6890
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage512 GB256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display7" • Foldable LTPO AMOLED pOLED • 165Hz6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz
Main Camera50MP50MP
Front Camera50MP50MP
OSAndroid 15Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 580.99 cheaper
vsRazr 60 UltraUSD 1,300
RAM
4 GB more RAM
vsX300 E12 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
vsX300 E256 GB
Battery
53% larger battery
vsRazr 60 Ultra4,700 mAh
Charging
22 W faster wired charging
vsRazr 60 Ultra68 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
Larger165Hz
vsX300 E6.59″ · 144Hz

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

More hardware
More RAM and storage16 GB RAM · 512 GB
Larger 165Hz display7″ · 165Hz
Best if you want

vivo X300 E

More hardware
Much lower purchase priceUSD 719
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Smaller 6.59-inch display6.59″

What CompareTab says about Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs vivo X300 E

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra offers more RAM and storage than X300 E, with 16 GB of RAM versus 12 GB, 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB, and a 165 Hz display instead of 144 Hz. vivo X300 E, however, is around $581 cheaper, has a larger 7200 mAh battery versus 4700 mAh and higher quoted peak brightness at 5000 nits versus 4500 nits, and supports faster wired charging at 90 W versus 68 W. The choice comes down to Razr 60 Ultra’s extra RAM, storage, and smoother display versus X300 E’s lower price, larger battery, higher quoted peak brightness, and faster charging.