Motorola Razr 60 Pro
$790
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| Razr 60 Pro | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 790 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 4300 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 44 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO P-OLED • 165Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 539 cheaper
Y32 (2026)USD 251
vsRazr 60 ProUSD 790
RAM
3× more RAM
Razr 60 Pro12 GB RAM
vsY32 (2026)4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Razr 60 Pro256 GB
vsY32 (2026)128 GB
Battery
86% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsRazr 60 Pro4,300 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
Razr 60 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
165 Hz refresh
Razr 60 Pro165 Hz
vsY32 (2026)120 Hz
Build
40 g lighter
Razr 60 Pro189 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Razr 60 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Up to 165 Hz display6.9-inch
Lighter build189 g
Best if you want
Lower pricevivo Y32 (2026)
Much lower purchase priceUSD 251
Larger battery8,000 mAh
What CompareTab says about Motorola Razr 60 Pro vs vivo Y32 (2026)
Motorola Razr 60 Pro has more RAM and storage than Y32 (2026), with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, and a 165 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and wireless charging. vivo Y32 (2026), however, is around $539 cheaper and has a larger 8000 mAh battery versus 4300 mAh. The main trade-off is Razr 60 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, smoother display, camera features, and wireless charging versus Y32 (2026)’s lower price and larger battery.
