Motorola Razr 60 Pro
$790
Motorola Razr 60 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
$900
| Razr 60 Pro | Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 790 | USD 900 |
| Battery | 4300 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 25 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO P-OLED • 165Hz | 6.7" • Dynamic AMOLED 2X Foldable • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 10MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 109.99 cheaper
Razr 60 ProUSD 790
vsGalaxy Z Flip 7 FEUSD 900
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Razr 60 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy Z Flip 7 FE8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Razr 60 Pro256 GB
vsGalaxy Z Flip 7 FE128 GB
Battery
8% larger battery
Razr 60 Pro4,300 mAh
vsGalaxy Z Flip 7 FE4,000 mAh
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Razr 60 Pro45 W wired
vsGalaxy Z Flip 7 FE25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Razr 60 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635
vsGalaxy Z Flip 7 FESamsung Exynos 2400
Display
Larger165Hz
Razr 60 Pro6.9″ · 165Hz
vsGalaxy Z Flip 7 FE6.7″ · 120Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Razr 60 Pro
Much lower purchase priceUSD 790
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery4,300 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
What CompareTab says about Motorola Razr 60 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
Motorola Razr 60 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 4300 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 165 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 10 MP) and 45W charging.
