motorola moto E32
$160
motorola moto E32 vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E
$719
| moto E32 | X300 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 160 | USD 719 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 90 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 16MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 559 cheaper
moto E32USD 160
vsX300 EUSD 719
RAM
3× more RAM
X300 E12 GB RAM
vsmoto E324 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
X300 E256 GB
vsmoto E3264 GB
Battery
44% larger battery
X300 E7,200 mAh
vsmoto E325,000 mAh
Charging
80 W faster wired charging
X300 E90 W wired
vsmoto E3210 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
moto E32Unisoc T606
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
144 Hz refresh
X300 E144 Hz
vsmoto E3290 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower pricemotorola moto E32
Much lower purchase priceUSD 160
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 E
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about motorola moto E32 vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over moto E32, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 16 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 90W charging. motorola moto E32, however, is around $559 cheaper and lighter at 184 g versus 199.5 g. The main trade-off is X300 E’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus moto E32’s lower price and lighter build.
