Lenovo Moto Z
$699
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| Moto Z | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 699 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 2600 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 44 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 5.5" • AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 448 cheaper
Y32 (2026)USD 251
vsMoto ZUSD 699
Storage
4× more storage
Y32 (2026)128 GB
vsMoto Z32 GB
Battery
208% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsMoto Z2,600 mAh
Charging
29 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsMoto Z15 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Moto ZQualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsMoto Z5.5″ · 60Hz
Build
93 g lighter
Moto Z136 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactLenovo Moto Z
Lighter build136 g
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
Much lower purchase priceUSD 251
More storage128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
What CompareTab says about Lenovo Moto Z vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has the larger display and faster wired charging than Moto Z, with 128 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 2600 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP). Lenovo Moto Z, however, is lighter at 136 g versus 229 g and thinner at 5.19 mm versus 8.69 mm. The main trade-off is Y32 (2026)’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Moto Z’s lighter, thinner build.
