LG K61
$329
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| K61 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 329 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 44 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.53" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 78 cheaper
Y32 (2026)USD 251
vsK61USD 329
Battery
100% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsK614,000 mAh
Charging
34 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsK6110 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
K61MediaTek Helio P35
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsK616.53″ · 60Hz
Build
38 g lighter
K61191 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
K6116MP front
vsY32 (2026)8MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactLG K61
Lighter build191 g
Higher-resolution front camera16MP front
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
Much lower purchase priceUSD 251
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about LG K61 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has the larger display and faster wired charging than K61, with a 8000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 10 W. LG K61, however, is lighter at 191 g versus 229 g and has a higher-resolution 16 MP front camera. The main trade-off is the Y32 (2026)’s faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the K61’s lighter build and higher-resolution front camera.
