Boltt Ace 5G
$147
Boltt Ace 5G vs ZTE Blade A35
ZTE Blade A35
$99
| Ace 5G | Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 147 | USD 99 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8200 | UNISOC SC9863A1 |
| Display | 6.79" • LCD • 120Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 8MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 48 cheaper
Blade A35USD 99
vsAce 5GUSD 147
Battery
20% larger battery
Ace 5G6,000 mAh
vsBlade A355,000 mAh
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Ace 5G18 W wired
vsBlade A3510 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Ace 5GUnisoc T8200
vsBlade A35UNISOC SC9863A1
Display
120 Hz refresh
Ace 5G120 Hz
vsBlade A3590 Hz
Build
41 g lighter
Blade A35192 g
vsAce 5G233 g
Camera
Higher resolution
Ace 5G64MP rear · 8MP front
vsBlade A358MP rear · 5MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareBoltt Ace 5G
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.79-inch
Higher-resolution cameras64MP rear · 8MP front
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Blade A35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Lighter build192 g
What CompareTab says about Boltt Ace 5G vs ZTE Blade A35
Boltt Ace 5G has the larger display and faster wired charging than Blade A35, with a 6000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 18 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (64 MP versus 8 MP) and NFC. ZTE Blade A35, however, is cheaper at around $99 versus $147 and lighter at 192 g versus 233 g. The choice comes down to Ace 5G’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Blade A35’s lower price and lighter build.
