Alcatel OT-993 vs Oppo Reno16 FS

close
Alcatel OT-993

Alcatel OT-993

$185

512 GB RAM 3 GB

close
Oppo Reno16 FS

Oppo Reno16 FS

$890

8 GB RAM 512 GB

OT-993Reno16 FS
PriceUSD 185USD 890
Battery1500 mAh6500 mAh
Charging (W)545
RAM512 GB8 GB
Storage3 GB512 GB
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227AMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
Display4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz
Main Camera5MP50MP
Front Camera0.3MP50MP
OSAndroid 4.0 Ice Cream SandwichAndroid 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 705 cheaper
vsReno16 FSUSD 890
RAM
64× more RAM
vsReno16 FS8 GB RAM
Storage
509 GB more storage
vsOT-9933 GB
Battery
333% larger battery
vsOT-9931,500 mAh
Charging
40 W faster wired charging
vsOT-9935 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsReno16 FSMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
Display
Larger120Hz
vsOT-9934″ · 60Hz

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Alcatel OT-993

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 185
More RAM512 GB RAM
Smaller 4-inch display4″
Best if you want

Oppo Reno16 FS

More hardware
More storage512 GB
Larger battery6,500 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.57″ · 120Hz

What CompareTab says about Alcatel OT-993 vs Oppo Reno16 FS

Oppo Reno16 FS has the larger display and faster wired charging than OT-993, with 512 GB of storage versus 3 GB, a 6500 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 45 W wired charging versus 5 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 5 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. Alcatel OT-993, however, is around $705 cheaper and lighter at 150 g versus 194 g and offers 512 GB of RAM versus 8 GB. The main trade-off is the Reno16 FS’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus the OT-993’s lower price and lighter build.