Acer C6 Liquid Express vs POCO F9 Ultra

close
Acer C6 Liquid Express

Acer C6 Liquid Express

$250

0 GB RAM 0 GB

close
POCO F9 Ultra

POCO F9 Ultra

$799

12 GB RAM 256 GB

C6 Liquid ExpressF9 Ultra
PriceUSD 250USD 799
Battery1300 mAh8050 mAh
Charging (W)N/A100
RAMN/A12 GB
StorageN/A256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm MSM7227T-1 Snapdragon S1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display3.5" • TFT LCD • 60Hz6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz
Main Camera5MP200MP
Front Camera0MP32MP
OSAndroid 2.3.3 GingerbreadAndroid 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 549 cheaper
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
RAM
12 GB more RAM
vsC6 Liquid Express0 GB RAM
Storage
256 GB more storage
vsC6 Liquid Express0 GB
Battery
519% larger battery
vsC6 Liquid Express1,300 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
vsC6 Liquid Express3.5″ · 60Hz
Build
97 g lighter
vsF9 Ultra235 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Acer C6 Liquid Express

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 250
Lighter build138 g
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″
Best if you want

POCO F9 Ultra

More hardware
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz

What CompareTab says about Acer C6 Liquid Express vs POCO F9 Ultra

POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than C6 Liquid Express, with 12 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 0.5 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 5 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. Acer C6 Liquid Express, however, is around $549 cheaper and lighter at 138 g versus 235 g. The main trade-off is F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus C6 Liquid Express’s lower price and lighter build.